 | | Re: valuing lego for insurance purposes
|
|
Frances in Tassie has her Lego insured as a separate collection. Better to do it this way rather than through the general household insurance. I believe (though I'm happy to be corrected) that she used Bricklink prices as evidence of the value of (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
 | | Re: valuing lego for insurance purposes
|
|
(...) Easy: Ring your current insurance company and ask what they will accept. (A good point to start at will be a list of purchases and how much you paid. Receipts would be good too. Keep in mind that Lego might not be a particularly risky (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
 | | valuing lego for insurance purposes
|
|
I have a large collection of lego including sets purchased new, sets purchased second hand and parts (some from sets I have bought and kept only some parts from but most from second hand sources). The parts are in various levels of quality (some are (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
 | | Re: My average set
|
|
(...) God Damn you people! thanks to this Mindless discussion I now look at every word I see and start to think of abbreviations that word could have. Damn it, Damn it, Damn IT! Although some of them have been interesting. I shouldn't have suggested (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-05, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
 | | Re: My average set
|
|
(...) Didn't they tell you: pete.w = Pete Eventually Tries Every Word. Cheers Richie Dulin (21 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.loc.au, FTX)
|