 | | A couple of new RRP's [8457 and 8458]
|
|
I'm not sure if this is the final RRP, or below it, but the Camberwell toyworld quoted me the following prices for a couple of new technic sets: 8457: $240-$260 8458: $370 [Released September] However, as Paul Baulch has stated recently [in (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au)
|
| |
| | RE: New catalogue (Was Re: Benjamin Whytcross's homepage ?)
|
|
(...) Agreed :-) (...) catalogue. I take it you hadn't looked at page 58 under the Naboo fighter, on the right of the sith infiltrator. [the bucket isn't shown, just the set....But they DO call it a podrace bucket.] (...) Well, if certain people (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Studfest 2000: Part the Fourth
|
|
(...) Looking great Richard.... : ) I love the story so far..... The pics look fine..... : ) Kev... : ) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | NED v6 (was re: Looks like even less availability for us here)
|
|
(...) Ohhhhh.....I don't know - it read fine on my browser. Maybe its the way you've got your preferences set - or maybe your version of Nile's Expletive Delet-o-matic is needing updating. v6 has been out for a while, and I'm not sure how backward (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Studfest 2000: Part the Fourth
|
|
Basic page is online - as more pics come to hand, will furnish same :-) Find from (URL) is also the beginnings of the BrikWars saga. I have the pics, I just have to keep writing. As always, I just made it up, and it is entirely open to (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Looks like even less availability for us here.
|
|
Dave Low <stinglessbee@hotSPA...Email.com> wrote in message news:FzByLn.EK2@lugnet.com... (...) Australia (...) major (...) Studios (...) when (...) Didn't catch the original message, though I've got a few definitions of descriptions that I've (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.org.au, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Looks like even less availability for us here.
|
|
Yes, it is. Now cut it out with the <expletive deleted, although I don't really know why I bother anyway> and bring the thing down to something manageable, like <expletive deleted>, before I get myself annoyed as heck about something I normally (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.org.au, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | New catalogue (Was Re: Benjamin Whytcross's homepage ?)
|
|
Jamie Obrien wrote in message ... (...) (URL) And people were criticising the podracer bucket! There is no justice :-) Actually, there isn't any mention of the podracer bucket in this catalogue. Best value Lego set apart from the soccer sets and do (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Looks like even less availability for us here.
|
|
Dave Low wrote in message ... (...) material, (...) This "habit" certain people have is becoming <expletive indicating annoyance at the insertion of lengthy expressions which interrupt the flow of the sentence and make it very difficult to read, (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.org.au, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Looks like even less availability for us here.
|
|
(...) I think it means "totally new lines": it would really help Lego if they could get someone who is 100% fluent in English to write their promotional material, instead of a <expletive indicating a souped-up Babelfish using a Microsoft thesaurus (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.org.au, lugnet.loc.au)
|
