Subject:
|
Re: bulk should mean more than 10
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Fri, 1 Sep 2000 00:38:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
740 times
|
| |
|
|
Geoffrey Hyde wrote:
>
> Bulk means different things to different people. Unless one is embarking on
> an ambitious project involving hundreds of windows, 10, or a multiple
> thereof, would sufficient for most of us I would think!!
The problem is that there is an overhead cost that is probably
very close to the same whether the pack has 10 or 100 windows.
I'm guessing that this overhead cost is a large proportion
of the $4.99 that 10 windows cost, and that TLC could
sell packs of 100 (or 1000, or 10,000) for $0.50 or less
per window.
/Eric McC/
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: bulk should mean more than 10
|
| (...) Yes, but overhead is just the problem. Since few people need 50 windows, they wouldn't sell many sets, and the overhead of creating and advertising the package would be divided among fewer sets. There are definite diminishing returns, here. (...) (24 years ago, 1-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: bulk should mean more than 10
|
| Bulk means different things to different people. Unless one is embarking on an ambitious project involving hundreds of windows, 10, or a multiple thereof, would sufficient for most of us I would think!! Cheers ... Geoffrey Hyde Eric McCarthy (...) (24 years ago, 31-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
