 | | Re: Question: Why allow postings of lego.direct on lugnet at all? (sarcasm warning) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) "Milton Train Works(tm)" is the proper spelling and capitalization for the brand... (...) All well and good but if you are not looking at my MOCS for sale, you are missing out on a pretty good share of my MOC output these days. So keep an eye (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Question: Why allow postings of lego.direct on lugnet at all? (sarcasm warning) —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | (...) The horror, the horror...maybe I'll actually survive being thusly deprived. (...) And we would know this because you managed to post twice to the newsgroup lugnet.lego.direct with essentially irrelevent marketplace material? Or are you just (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Question: Why allow postings of lego.direct on lugnet at all? (sarcasm warning) —James Brown
|
| | | | | (...) Richard, are you seriously claiming that Lar's response to you is "marketing"???? Talk about spiting your face... (...) Hop-Frog, this stance on what is marketing is pretty darn extreme, even for you. James James (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Question: Why allow postings of lego.direct on lugnet at all? (sarcasm warning) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) I have no doubt of it. You're not a trainhead. That's not the point though. The point is what I said. If you want (and I am not saying you should or should not, that is your choice) to see what I'm up to creatively, that's where you are going (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | |
