Subject:
|
Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Fri, 14 Jun 2002 19:23:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2298 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego.direct, Suzanne D. Rich writes:
> In lugnet.lego.direct, Jake McKee writes: [...]
> > Why am I not answering questions on LUGNET?
> >
> > Most questions of LEGO actually get asked outside of lego.direct. Since I
> > can't answer those questions "officially" and I'm not sure what the
> > appropriate method of cross linking the answer with the question, I feel
> > uncomfortable posting about that issue out of context. I would absolutely
> > love if I could, along with other LD employees, post directly to a question
> > with a few brief lines to answer a question in context. Unfortunately,
> > LUGNET prohibits this.
> >
> > [...]
> > Jake
> >
> > ---
> > Jake McKee
> > Senior Producer
> > LEGO Direct
>
> Thank you, Jake.
> I just wanted to confirm my suspicion.[1]
>
> Such a lack of maturity from one who's actions reflect on The LEGO Company
> is very disappointing. But, your 'using' of this community is inexcusable.
>
> -Suz
> LUGNET Admin
>
> [1] Since our last phone conversation a few months ago, in which Jake again
> asked for sitewide posting and I answered in the negative, he has been
> giving this entire community the 'silent treatment' in hopes to 'get his way.'
This whole thread has gotten out of hand!
This seems to be the point where the "public" communications fall apart. I
don't wish to take sides, particularly where we're all assumed to be on the
*same* side. For what it's worth, what I see here is a communication
between two people, each with a staggering amount of responsibility, trying
to follow rules imposed upon them by their affiliations, and yet say what
they mean.
Sometimes, despite our best intentions, a plan which seems simple on the
surface can be too difficult to implement. Sometimes for reasons which are
only apparent to one "side". I think the chief problem at this point is a
breakdown of the mutual respect required for any intelligent conversation.
Regardless of what the apparent (and hidden) issue may be, I believe any
emotionally packed responses can only contribute to conflict, and should be
confined to personal email, or the like. As an AFOL, I am disheartened to
see what appears to be petty conflict strewn through the pages of LUGNET. I
dislike this from fellow FOL's, and I dislike it from administrators and
LEGO representatives as well.
If a solution cannot be worked out to mutual satisfaction, perhaps we should
all agree to disagree. Not all difficulties can be worked out in life.
Sometimes we just have to say, "Oh, well. That's life!" and get on with
said life.
In short, (woops! too late!) whether TLC participation on LUGNET continues
or not, I would feel a lot better if I didn't read arguments worthy of high
school cafeteria gossip on the pages of LUGNET, particularly in discussions
of the future of one of my favorite websites. I love LUGNET! I love LEGO!
But if petty bickering continues, I will visit here less and less.
Concerned,
Tim Romine
AFOL for life
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
| In lugnet.lego.direct, Jake McKee writes: [...] (...) Thank you, Jake. I just wanted to confirm my suspicion.[1] Such a lack of maturity from one who's actions reflect on The LEGO Company is very disappointing. But, your 'using' of this community is (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct) !!
|
134 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
