Subject:
|
Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Fri, 14 Jun 2002 15:59:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2430 times
|
| |
|
|
ouch.
I saw this and was so appalled I just had to reply.
I don't know Jake, but to see Suzanne make assumptions
about his character and his motivations is shocking.
The tenor of Jake's verbage is clear and professional.
By contrast, the tenor of Suzanne's is petty and childish.
(We assume about other's behaviour that which we hate
most about our own)
I for one get the sense that here is a fan community
that is making it difficult for the representatives of
the fandom to interact w/ the fans. Would a RockBand
fan club site be so rude and difficult w/ the RockBand?
This is baffling to me (at best), and suicidal for the fan
community at large (at worst).
Here's hoping there's a light at the end of the tunnel...
-paul
In lugnet.lego.direct, Suzanne D. Rich writes:
> In lugnet.lego.direct, Jake McKee writes: [...]
> > Why am I not answering questions on LUGNET?
> >
> > Most questions of LEGO actually get asked outside of lego.direct. Since I
> > can't answer those questions "officially" and I'm not sure what the
> > appropriate method of cross linking the answer with the question, I feel
> > uncomfortable posting about that issue out of context. I would absolutely
> > love if I could, along with other LD employees, post directly to a question
> > with a few brief lines to answer a question in context. Unfortunately,
> > LUGNET prohibits this.
> >
> > [...]
> > Jake
> >
> > ---
> > Jake McKee
> > Senior Producer
> > LEGO Direct
>
> Thank you, Jake.
> I just wanted to confirm my suspicion.[1]
>
> Such a lack of maturity from one who's actions reflect on The LEGO Company
> is very disappointing. But, your 'using' of this community is inexcusable.
>
> -Suz
> LUGNET Admin
>
> [1] Since our last phone conversation a few months ago, in which Jake again
> asked for sitewide posting and I answered in the negative, he has been
> giving this entire community the 'silent treatment' in hopes to 'get his way.'
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
| (...) Perhaps so, but only because the representatives of the fandom have made it at times difficult to remain fans (of this particular interactive medium, at least). If Jake is truly worried that AFOL's will object to such LD comments as "we can't (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
| In lugnet.lego.direct, Jake McKee writes: [...] (...) Thank you, Jake. I just wanted to confirm my suspicion.[1] Such a lack of maturity from one who's actions reflect on The LEGO Company is very disappointing. But, your 'using' of this community is (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct) !!
|
134 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
