| |
> In lugnet.lego.direct, Suzanne D. Rich writes:
> Jake,
> Why are you answering people's questions on FBTB, but not LUGNET?
> I ask because the lugnet.lego.direct group was created for open dialogue,
> yet LD's posts are now rare and limited to marketing announcements.
---
> Then Tamyra Teed wrote:
> controlled as to where [they] can post...
> And then John Rudy wrote:
> Restriction is unfair
> And then Matt Hein wrote:
> stirred by over "inquisitiveness" or what I like to say
> as too much attention towards company presence.
All good and valid points, but I do understand and sympathies with Suz.
Because it really seams as though LD is simply using
Lugnet as a marketing forum to test their products and
promote their objectives. I may be new, but it didn’t
appear as though LD ever attempted to initiate open
conversation. And I believe the restrictions were
implemented to protect our community (Lugnet)
from corporate propaganda.
--==RïçhårÐ==--
Call me dyslexic, but I thought the lego.direct group was
originally/ideally meant to foster and develop relations with
TLG. A place to call their own, and not as a segregationist
implement of restriction. But that’s just what I believed
was the initial nature of the endeavor…conversely, my
perspective could be skewed cause I'm just a ‘Pollyanna.’
=P
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
| Jake, Why are you answering people's questions on FBTB, but not LUGNET? I ask because the lugnet.lego.direct group was created for open dialogue, yet LD's posts are now rare and limited to marketing announcements. -Suz Suzanne Rich LUGNET Admin (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct) !!
|
134 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
