Subject:
|
Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 Jun 2002 04:16:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2103 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego.direct, Thomas Avery writes:
> In lugnet.lego.direct, Troy Cefaratti writes:
> > In my opinion this is the key point moreso then limiting where TLC employees
> > can post. I can understand the limits. I believe it was established so
> > that it could be determinied if a person was posting AS an employee of TLC
> > opposed to just posting their opinion as an AFOL. I can see where it would
> > be important to make this distiction.
>
> I think you're right. Besides, quite often when someone from TLC posts
> something important, it's quickly forwarded to the appropriate groups (if
> necessary) by Lugnet readers.
Isn't it against the rules to do so, though? Or is it just against the rules
for Jake to ask in his post that someone do it but OK if someone figures out
that it needs doing on their own? I'm admittedly confused about it.
> It's also nice to know that all posts from TLC's employees (about "official"
> business) are contained within that group. FBTB.net has a specific category
> that allows you to see all posts from TLC employees.
>
> > I would, however, get rather tired of posting in a hurry if everytime I did
> > post, on any subject, i got hammered about stuff that is not relevant to the
> > post. If every post is answered with "Why don't you offer more bulk yet" or
> > "Why doesn't SAH ship to <insert country> yet", I certainly would stop
> > posting in a hurry.
>
> I agree that it may be tiring and it's also annoying, but being badgered by
> these unnecessary questions just goes with the territory.
There really is no reason that it should "go with the territory"... FBTB
readers seem to understand that Jake can't comment on certain things and
don't badger him nearly as badly about those things. Shows a bit more
understanding of how the world actually works on their part, doesn't it?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
| (...) I dunno, but I don't think it's too inappropriate: (URL)There really is no reason that it should "go with the territory"... FBTB (...) I don't know, I don't frequent the FBTB forums too often. I don't have a feel for FBTB readers. We're acting (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
| (...) I think you're right. Besides, quite often when someone from TLC posts something important, it's quickly forwarded to the appropriate groups (if necessary) by Lugnet readers. It's also nice to know that all posts from TLC's employees (about (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
134 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
