|
|
 | | Re: $2,137.00
|
| (...) [...] (...) It tends to drive up the final price, in my opinion. I think it's better to wait until the last minute (or in some cases, the last 10 seconds) of an auction before submitting your true highest bid... --Bill. XFUT: (...) (24 years ago, 13-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.market.theory)
| | | | | Re: You get to choose!
|
| (...) At least they did re-release 8459 (as 8464). Though not a "legends" release, it certainly made me happy 8?) ROSCO (24 years ago, 13-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: $2,137.00
|
| (...) ferroequus was never a high bidder. Here's the play by play: 1. dansoere (0) bid $60.00 on Apr-02-02 12:02:56 <-- High Bidder 2. robertjay2002 (0) bid $51.00 on Apr-02-02 12:18:29 3. robertjay2002 (0) bid $55.00 on Apr-02-02 12:19:06 4. (...) (24 years ago, 13-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: $2,137.00
|
| (...) Frank explained the mechanics, as for the motivation I speculate he was trying to outbid the current high bidder but by just a little. That's a sign of indecisiveness, inexperience, or possibly bid shielding. Hope that helps. FUT market.theory (...) (24 years ago, 13-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.market.theory)
| | | | | Re: Why not a cypress tree in the Legends re-release of 6390?
|
| (...) My guess: because of all the complains about the "bent" cypresses? ;-) (...) This one I sort of disagree: if they are to use the method from 6542, it may prove to be more functional. OTOH, I could use the older system just as good as a source (...) (24 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
|
