 | | Re: WHY SO LONG ON BULK BRICKS???? LEGO PLEASE READ! —Mike Walsh
|
| | | "Allan Bedford" <apotomeREMOVE-THIS@...vista.net> wrote in message news:Go5y2L.5I5@lugnet.com... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) trying (...) distribution (...) [ ... snipped ... ] This isn't completely true. The 2002 catalog scans were provided to FBTB (...) (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: WHY SO LONG ON BULK BRICKS???? LEGO PLEASE READ! —Kevin Johnston
|
| | | | (...) Tim may correct me (don't know if he reads this board, don't care enough to X-post it), but I'm pretty sure the catalog came out of a FBTB reader's Darth Maul or other new SW set, which was then mailed to Tim. The watermark is just Tim's usual (...) (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: WHY SO LONG ON BULK BRICKS???? LEGO PLEASE READ! —Tim Saupé
|
| | | | (...) In reality, the 'watermark' was placed there at the request of LEGO. I typically only read .starwars, but I do run a search of 'fbtb' every now and then to see what's being said and saw this. (23 years ago, 27-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | |
