 | | Re: This is stupid... I can't tolerate this *juniorization*... —Victor Knight
|
| | | (...) I guess that's true but I thought we were talking about instances where the TLG model was good. If we're talking about as a set of parts, then yes. (23 years ago, 12-Aug-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: This is stupid... I can't tolerate this *juniorization*... —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) OK. I'll defend the Camel as a good, even great, model, though. It isn't minifig scale but neither are other model team sets. It's a bit bigger scale than model team but it is along the same lines. I found it to be a very enjoyable build. (...) (23 years ago, 12-Aug-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: This is stupid... I can't tolerate this *juniorization*... —Jonathan Dallas
|
| | | | (...) Just my two cents. I bought the green dragon. I found the set to be challenging, and a well designed set. Granted it is a little too cute for me, but still a nice design. On top of that, once you take it apart you have tons (tonnes) of green (...) (23 years ago, 13-Aug-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: This is stupid... I can't tolerate this *juniorization*... —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Agreed. And I would argue that the sets that LD has brought out so far under their aegis are hitting this mark quite well. LD gets it. LD knows what we want and LD is delivering. I've said it before and I'll no doubt (to the annoyance of those (...) (23 years ago, 13-Aug-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
