 | | Re: Availability of Soccer Women's Team #3416? —Mike Walsh
|
| | | "LUGNET Admin" <todd@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:3af8cf68.292414...net.com... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) official (...) use (...) free (...) I read this article this morning and my initial thought was "great, here we go again". Let's alienate (...) (24 years ago, 9-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Availability of Soccer Women's Team #3416? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) So fix it already. Until you do I suggest that what really matters is the *SIGNATURE* on the post. NOT the email address associated with it. (...) Guess what. I decided this was an offical statement by the sig. I didn't even look at the email (...) (24 years ago, 9-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Availability of Soccer Women's Team #3416? — Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Suzanne and I disagree. However, we do plan to make it easier. (...) I wasn't taking a poll. (...) Listen, LEGO is getting a free ride here. There's no _burden_ to make it easier to post. However, I do agree that making it easier is a good (...) (24 years ago, 9-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | |
