|
|
 | | Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!)
|
| (...) Welcome back. (...) Me too. (although I sent a copy of MTW-4001 to the executives at Skyline Chili, I put #01 up for bid, just as I always do with new sets) (...) Exactly. The alternative that Rick gave of having some 7 year old get it would (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: Going once, going twice, sold!
|
| (...) Ditto Jake. Just ignore the people whining about you doing the auctions as Brad previously announced, it is probably a case of sour grapes. Jude (23 years ago, 3-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!)
|
| "Rick Clark" <jrclark@nospam.aol.com> ha scritto nel messaggio news:3CAAC42B.300060...aol.com... (...) but (...) Rick, I admit my fault here: I didn't know this was their original plan, and didn't realize it was clearly stated from the beginning. (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!)
|
| (...) Whilst I agree with your sentiment, I don't see it as being "obvious". One would have to see the balance sheet to say that (I wonder who audits the accounts?). (...) Hardly out on a limb - a limited production run set which fits in well with (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!)
|
| (...) A violation of which rules? Doesn't a numbered, limited edition of anything automatically *create* rarity? Seems to me that most numbered, limited editions don't even offer the #1 unit to the public, preferring to give it to the president of (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
|
