 | | Re: LEGO website bug report: Invalid forward apostrophe character
|
|
(...) This is correct grammar but looks wrong to some people. RWRATP (1) thusly: We need the help of LEGO(r) parents. 1 - Real Writers Rewrite Around The Problem (2) 2 - from IBMTEXT NITPICK FORUM ++Lar (24 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: TLC hiring fans (was: Re: AFOLs as cheapskates)
|
|
(...) Well, why wouldn't it? I don't really know the implications of being the district rep, but I'm pretty sure he said he covered the WA/ID/OR area. ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (24 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: TLC hiring fans (was: Re: AFOLs as cheapskates)
|
|
Mark Sandlin wrote in message ... (...) He (...) a (...) here. (...) to (...) Can this really be true? Rose (24 years ago, 15-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: !!Warning- Pure Speculation!!
|
|
(...) Maybe , but I thought Pov ray did that!! But i'll consider adding radiosity and light sources to the LCAD02 Standard I am thinking about writing.. (...) Yes.. Exactly... The whole purpose of the a 'speculative post is to encourage friendly (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: !!Warning- Pure Speculation!!
|
|
So, what you're saying (to cad.dev) is you'd like someone to put together a real-time radiosity solution to use semitransparent bricks and multiple light sources? Hmm... might take 2-3 months... Oh wait, it could be done with plastic, like those (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
