| | Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?) Ka-On Lee
|
| | (...) And acted on that too. We noticed the bulk sets, UCS and scrupture sets. (...) But does that let you sell more sets? The only benefit I can see is the reduction of minimum age from 5 to 4. By that reason Playmobile should be doing very well. (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | |
| | | | Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?) Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) Exactly. The fundamental *strength* Lego has is that the product is unlike video games and MTV. Playstation and Nintendo will *always* make better instant-gratification action than Lego -- trying to fight them on that ground is a losing (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?) Bradley Dale
|
| | | | (...) be (...) But now there is LEGO on Playstation and Nintendo- how do you feel about that? (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?) Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) That's fine -- in fact, it's great for them to tie in with other media. I'm a big fan of where they're going with the Rock Raiders and Alpha Team multimedia (in the true sense) concepts, although I think the implementation could be better. (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?) Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | | (...) that? (...) I'm (...) implementation (...) Indeed. As a player of many different video games over the years (Everything from the Atari 2600 on), the LEGO versions seem a little..... well boring. Most of them are targeted along the lines of (...) (24 years ago, 5-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |