To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.legoOpen lugnet.lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 LEGO Company / 934
933  |  935
Subject: 
Re: General session Q&A
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.lego
Date: 
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 01:09:03 GMT
Viewed: 
3854 times
  
In lugnet.lego, Paulo Renato wrote:
In lugnet.lego, Gregory Muri wrote:
Problems is that if AFOL's took this approach, it would then be our fault
Lego continued to have a financial decline.  No doubt in my mind that is how
it would go down.  Clearly TLC has no intention of admitting the severity of
the color changes.

Greg


I wouldn't like to see TLC going down but, what else would it take to them to go
back on this issue?? (Once they can't hear us...)

Paulo Renato

I think it would be interesting to know just how much each and every AFOL spends
each week/month/year on Lego. Just to try to gauge how much in potential lost
sales the company would incure. Would it be significant?
Have any Bricklink stores curbed their spending? I know they buy dozens or more
sets at a time.

For instance, I know I spent just over $11,000.00 last year. Most of that was
spent at the retail level, but not at retail prices. HAIL, the clearance sale.
A smaller amount was spent on the secondary market such as BL and evilbay.

Now I realize not everyone here is just going to stop buying new sets because of
the color change. I for one will not be buying any new sets. Well, until they
are 75% off.

Steve



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: General session Q&A
 
(...) I wouldn't like to see TLC going down but, what else would it take to them to go back on this issue?? (Once they can't hear us...) Paulo Renato (21 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.lego)

70 Messages in This Thread:































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR