| | Re: On sale or not n sale Thomas Andersen
|
| | (...) Hi Jake, It seems that I am not able to express myself clear enough in english, sorry about that. I will try once again: The problem is that the price on the set K10022 was always 1784 DKK, and therefore it in my opinion not an sale, but as (...) (20 years ago, 15-Apr-05, to lugnet.lego)
|
| | |
| | | | RE: On sale or not n sale William Howard
|
| | | | The same is true in the UK See (URL) the text "It is also against the law for a shop to pretend that goods have been reduced from a higher price to a lower one." It also used to be the case (and I still think it is) that goods had to be on display (...) (20 years ago, 15-Apr-05, to lugnet.lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | Re: On sale or not n sale Jake McKee
|
| | | | (...) So to makes sure I understand, you concern is ONLY the use of the words "on sale" rather than "special bundle price"? (...) To be clear, there is NOT a new product involved here. All 7 sets are the exact same things you can buy separately. (...) (20 years ago, 15-Apr-05, to lugnet.lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: On sale or not n sale Anders Isaksson
|
| | | | | (...) Yes, I'm sure there is a language difference, but here in Sweden it's just like in Denmark: You are not allowed to say "on sale" unless you are selling a product that has been sold before at a higher price (The 'normal' price). The "on sale" (...) (20 years ago, 16-Apr-05, to lugnet.lego)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: On sale or not on sale Thomas Andersen
|
| | | | (...) If the words "On sale" were not present I would not be concerned, that is right. (...) I am aware of that, I was calling it a K10022 set, calling it a bundle is a bether word. (...) I do not agree with you on this one. You say: "The lower (...) (20 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.lego)
|
| | | | |