To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.legoOpen lugnet.lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 LEGO Company / 210
209  |  211
Subject: 
Re: Got some new news on Enfield Plant closing
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.lego, lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego
Date: 
Thu, 21 Dec 2000 23:18:29 GMT
Viewed: 
1811 times
  
I still fail to see how this will save them money, unless:
    1 - having the extra sets of molds/machines is killing production costs
    2 - the raw ABS is ONLY available from Europe.

I can't see how molding the bricks overseas and shipping them to the US will be
cheaper than molding them here UNLESS the raw ABS is only available overseas and
they are currently shipping it HERE to be molded.  Even then, the shipping costs
will be GREATLY increased, as molded bricks take up MUCH more volume than raw
pellets.

The extra machines can't be a factor, they'll either be destroying them or
shipping them to another plant, in which case they'll still be producing more
molds for those machines.  Unless they want MORE machines in one plant capable
of spitting out a bigger variety of pieces at any one time.

Personally, I think they should have kept the machines here, and shifted them
over to the specialized pieces for Bulk.


Larry Pieniazek wrote:

In lugnet.dear-lego, Kevin McMillin writes:

<snip>

The news articles all got it right and correctly identified molding as
ceasing. There's a nuance there, though, in that they're saying that they
will continue to pack sets (using pieces molded elsewhere only, instead of a
mix of molded in Enfield and elsewhere).

That's interesting. Thanks for sharing.

++Lar

--
| Tom Stangl, Technical Support          Netscape Communications Corp
|      Please do not associate my personal views with my employer



Message has 4 Replies:
  Re: Got some new news on Enfield Plant closing
 
(...) Well, according to (URL) letting 1,000 people go they save £83Mil(122,159,397 USD) I'm not sure. Kevin <snip of Larry's post> (24 years ago, 22-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
  Re: Got some new news on Enfield Plant closing
 
(...) be (...) and (...) costs (...) This seems glaringly obvious to me but apparently is eluding many. It is probably cheaper to ship molded parts to the US then to ship molded parts to Europe. If the plant in Enfield was shipping more to Europe (...) (24 years ago, 22-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
  Re: Got some new news on Enfield Plant closing
 
(...) <snip> (...) Lets try a different approach to understanding this. TLC recently opened a new production facility in the Czech Republic. This is talked about in this press release... (URL) The important part is the last lines in the release "It (...) (24 years ago, 22-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
  Re: Got some new news on Enfield Plant closing
 
(...) LEGO gets their ABS for Europe from Bayer. The U.S. Supply comes from GE. In other words, they can get the ABS from wherever they want to put a factory but it might take time to get the vendor up to speed. (URL) (many pages about LEGO and (...) (24 years ago, 25-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Got some new news on Enfield Plant closing
 
In lugnet.dear-lego, Kevin McMillin writes: <snip> The news articles all got it right and correctly identified molding as ceasing. There's a nuance there, though, in that they're saying that they will continue to pack sets (using pieces molded (...) (24 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)

10 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR