| | Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?) Kevin Loch
| | | (...) I can't belive this is true. Perhaps you meant "Parents have less time to spend with their kids." Everything I have heard, from kids, parents and various toy store employees that interact directly with them, is that "this set doesn't have (...) (24 years ago, 6-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | | | | Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?) Kevin Loch
| | | | | I just updated the poll with a related question: (...) pieces" (...) least (...) (24 years ago, 7-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?) Adrian Drake
| | | | | | (...) And you spelled juniorization wrong in the process :) Sometimes I'm too anal-retentive (yes, it has a hyphen) for my own good. Adrian -- www.brickfrenzy.com (24 years ago, 7-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?) Ross Crawford
| | | | | (...) I think we're all being a bit selfish here. I still distinctly remember when I got my first set, a 111 starter train set, and how much I loved it. According to LugNet, it has 120 pcs, a large number of which are rails / sleepers. Its something (...) (24 years ago, 9-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | | |