 | | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Cycle 2
|
| (...) This time around, are the ambassadors going to be given anything to communicate back to the communities they've been picked from? It seems that the first round were all immediately given NDAs to sign, preventing them from divulging any (...) (21 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.lego, FTX) !
| | | | | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Cycle 2
|
| (...) Fine, I've removed .nz from the crossposting. Tim (21 years ago, 5-Sep-05, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.loc.jp, lugnet.loc.hk, FTX)
| | | | | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Cycle 2
|
| (...) Although more people applying would be nice to see, the real requirement is better people applying. Cheers Richie Dulin (21 years ago, 5-Sep-05, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.loc.nz, lugnet.loc.jp, lugnet.loc.hk, FTX)
| | | | | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Cycle 2
|
| In lugnet.lego, Richie Dulin wrote: <snip> (...) Those two statements don't contradict one another, from what I see... It's like "We'll accept applications from all over the world!" If only Canadians send in applicaitons, then only Canadians will (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-05, to lugnet.lego) !
| | | | | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Cycle 2
|
| (...) From (URL) this post>: "...the first criteria before all others was to select the best group of candidates based on their applications. Now, if there was a 12 way tie, then perhaps location could help provide a tie-breaker" (emphasis mine) and (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-05, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
|
