 | | Re: Lego blew it AGAIN...
|
|
(...) I didn't say it was suprising. (...) At the time, that -was- superior technology. (...) I'm aware of that too. I'm a graphic designer and I use a Mac at work as well as at home. (...) I'm not talking about "outside of the USA." Since the (...) (26 years ago, 1-Oct-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego blew it AGAIN...
|
|
(...) Having had my attention called to this page, notice that the first version of the Rock Raiders dump truck bin appears to possibly be DUPLO! FUT: lugnet.underground Frank (26 years ago, 1-Oct-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.underground)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego blew it AGAIN...
|
|
(...) Yeah, the funny part is that I bought the legotechnic.com, legotechnic.org, and legotechnic.net domain names about two months ago (check out the WHOIS database and you'll see it's pointed at my DNS servers, just like my macgenius.com domain (...) (26 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Are the new Duplo trains a sign?
|
|
John Neal wrote in message <39D6E68E.DFB8BEE8@u...st.net>... (...) hope--that (...) line (...) enthusiasts (...) exceed (...) something (...) How do we know that they are abandoning the 9V line? What do you think is the possibility that they will (...) (26 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Are the new Duplo trains a sign?
|
|
(...) It is speculation at this point based upon info from this post: (URL) , and from the observation that minimal effort is being put into the 9 volt line. It appears to me at least that the 9 volt line has been riding the coattails of sets (...) (26 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
