 | | Grey zone debate wanted! (was: Lego in subdomains, legal or not?)
|
| Well, I believe that that big grey zone is there because the people at TLC is just as uncertain on how to place the boundary as we are; not to terrorize us with having a secret boundary to sit behind anxiously waiting for the opportunity to punish (...) (22 years ago, 12-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Lego in subdomains, legal or not?
|
| Hallo Ronald, (...) We had that already, it is now called BrickOS. Jürgen (22 years ago, 10-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: Lego in subdomains, legal or not?
|
| (...) I disagree - both about using "l3go" and about greater restrictions. Pushing towards an edge means that TLG will need to delinate it more clearly - which means less grey area. as for the "l3go", i think your average user would think something (...) (22 years ago, 10-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Lego in subdomains, legal or not?
|
| Hello Niels, (...) To me a name as l3go seems like getting as close to the edge as possible. Prehaps it's just (bearly) enough to be legal (but I'm not even sure about that), but it's certainly against the spirit of the rule. Looking for the edge (...) (22 years ago, 10-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Lego in subdomains, legal or not?
|
| You'll notice the dead trademark is for computer game rights. They obviously decided a jack stone computer game wouldnt sell. [should probably change follow up but no idea where it should go] (22 years ago, 10-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
|
