 | | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
"Scott A" <s.arthur@hw.ac.uk> wrote in message news:G0qAoF.I02@lugnet.com... (...) you (...) question (...) Why are you making a personal attack on Steve when he made a valid observation on your comments? (...) common (...) all (...) Sure, deadlines (...) (26 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
(...) I thought he was expressing disatisfaction with Lego in general. I don't entirely agree with him, but I thought the cheap shot was the above response. (...) In my judgment Steve made the personal attack. It's nice that a Lego representative is (...) (26 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
(...) Sorry, I did not mean to have my comments construed as a personal attack. I 100% accept that my post was rather pointless, my reply to Steve was meant to be a rhetorical question which infers that my post was not the only pointless one on (...) (26 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
(...) Looks like you missed it by two. (...) Rarely - I'd spend too much time posting followups to myself. (...) Nope, that's not it, either. Not that you questioned anyone. John Neal's post is a much better response than I'll ever be able to write. (...) (26 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
(...) (Backpedaling) Oh, did you think that I thought that Brad was quoting Shakespeare *there*? ;-) (...) Touché, Bruce. Nuttin' like being hoisted by one's own petard... and we Larritarians don't stomach humble pie very well:-) -John (...) (26 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
(...) LOL! Can anyone say "junior"? I know this post has caused some controversy, but I did think it was funny. I also think serious points could be drawn from it too. Juniorized pieces are a legitimate gripe for many of us. High price/piece ratios (...) (26 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
(...) OK. One more time. Let's all remember this, the offical party line is: Send me all your Lego pieces. There, that should do it. Let's party. -- Terry (the Critical Sycophant) K -- (26 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
(...) Scott, Do What I'm doing down here in Australia. Have very little to no expectations. That way you're rarely disappointed, and occasionally pleasantly surprised. Glad to say I haven't been disappointed yet ;) Santosh (26 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | RE: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
(...) Or pleasently surprised, I would guess :) Benjamin Whytcross BWhytcro@PacificAccess.com.au Ph: (03) 9856 5282 Directory Technology Pty Ltd 1/436 Elgar Road, Box Hill, 3128 Growing older is compulsory..Growing up isn't :-) (26 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | What if 9V went away? (Was re: LTMA vs NMRA
|
|
(...) I think I would remain active in Lego Trains. Whether or not I stayed with 9V or converted to the putative new system depends on the details. I convert all my 12V stuff to 9V, not because (V is better than 12V operationally, (it isn't, 12V has (...) (26 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
