 | | Re: the latest news
|
| (...) [snip] in a later message: (...) I think it was a good idea. This comment makes me glad I read news in a real newsreader and don't have my expectations colored by ratings. It sounds like the ratings are more an indication of the people who (...) (27 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: Regarding bulk orders: a proposal
|
| (...) Here are a couple of earlier threads on that subject, with related ideas about (sub)groups which might help LEGO Direct in their plans: (2 URLs) Direct has not yet made any effort to meet with us in person and talk about business plans, so (...) (27 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: the latest news
|
| (...) Not if they only made the hard to find pieces and the rest would be from a normal collection worth of parts to make 1 (...) (27 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: the latest news
|
| (...) Here here. I agree with Lar. It is nice to see that the "deep pocket" people may come in usefull after all. Especially after the recent upheaval involving the "haves" and the "have nots". Gary Istok (27 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: the latest news
|
| (...) The ratings indicate a reaction and collective recommendation to read. In the .lego.* groups, which are primarily intended as a communications link to the LEGO Comapny (.lego.direct in paricular), their primary reason for existing is to (...) (27 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
