 | | Re: Check LEGO set form Mobile Phone
|
|
(...) thats exactly what Lugnet offers here (URL) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
 | | Re: Check LEGO set form Mobile Phone
|
|
(...) thats exactly what Lugnet offers here (URL) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
 | | Re: Check LEGO set form Mobile Phone
|
|
Looks like the LUGNET version is WEB only, while this new version is a minimal interface created for some web enabled cell phones. (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
 | | Not at all a pact with the devil...
|
|
All, Let me first say that this post is from an AFOL that happens to know quite a bit about the Microsoft relationship. Brad is putting together a post to talk about the details of the alliance as we speak. However, in the meantime, I want to calm (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general) !
|
| |
 | | Re: Not at all a pact with the devil...
|
|
(...) Thanks, Jake. While I'm hardly a Microsoft fan (the only reason we have a Windoze machine in the house is because my wife wants to be able to play her computer games) I think the reaction here was way overboard and based on panic attack rather (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)
|
| |
 | | Re: Not at all a pact with the devil...
|
|
Jake, I am sorry but you should know better. First off not all of us think MS is the "Devil" nor did most of us participate in the conversation. You should know better than anyone that people will always discuss dissenting/negative views more (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)
|
| |
 | | Re: Not at all a pact with the devil...
|
|
(...) I'm pretty sure that was a joke referencing Micro$oft's claim that Internet Explorer was an integral part of Window$. At least, that's how it seemed to me. Likewise the posts talking about how "New bricks will not be compatible with old (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)
|
| |
 | | Re: Not at all a pact with the devil...
|
|
(...) Actually I haven't noticed it ealier (I jump straight to the news.lugnet.com), I agree with you Jake, calling names doesn't sound very professional. A headline like this tends to push the discussion in a negative direction. It's okay when in (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)
|
| |
 | | Re: LEGO website bug report: can't read scrolling text
|
|
In lugnet.lego.direct, Todd Lehman writes: <snip> (...) Man you arn't kidding. The site is awful. My Netscape browser locks up frequently enough using the site that I won't even go their any more. There is not one other site that gives me so many (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
 | | Re: Not at all a pact with the devil...
|
|
"Jake McKee" <jacob.mckee@america.lego.com> wrote in message news:G79H04.34L@lugnet.com... (...) So the devil got to you too eh? They're here, they're here! trust no one! :-) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)
|