 | | Re: minifigures in robes?
|
|
OOOHHHHHHH... " 'confirmed' "! Sorry, I didn't know that 'confirmed' meant gospel truth...truly, very sorry about that. I took a couple of minutes to trace the posts I believe you are referring to. Excerpts include: "Fortunately, someone posted a (...) (24 years ago, 8-Apr-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: minifigures in robes?
|
|
(...) ~~Hello?????? Did a really quick monkey run around and bite everyone in the eye when I posted. Cause it appears as though nobody saw my statement. “Confirmed” Minifig… means confirmed Minifig. I don’t recall exactly where I read it, but either (...) (24 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: minifigures in robes?
|
|
(...) Yes, I remember the offical LEGO/TLC announcement from New York Toyfare news stuff that plants Potter as a solid minifigure of standard LEFO ilk. And, yes, there is a monkey around here somewhere... Doh! They're sorted with my beasts and (...) (24 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: minifigures in robes?
|
|
(...) Die Harry-Potter-Figuren sollen MINIFIGS sein, keine Creator- oder Belville-Figuren which means "The Harry Potter Figures shall be minifigs, no Creator- or Belville figures." The implication is shall in the English 'will' sense, not the (...) (24 years ago, 28-Apr-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: minifigures in robes?
|
|
judging from the pictures that were mysteriously put on-line..... "not affiliated" with JK Rowlings or with movie producers... I'd say the robes look more like school blazers with house crests on the chest...that's my take on the situation. (24 years ago, 29-Apr-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
