Subject:
|
Re: Harry Potter License
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.harrypotter
|
Date:
|
Wed, 29 Oct 2003 17:17:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3259 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.harrypotter, Scott DeWolf wrote:
> Is it true that the license is only for the 1st 2 movies? Basically, is what we
> see out now all that we are getting?
As far as I know, the original license is to be 3 films. Warner has decided
to go on with the forth movie, which will start filming some time in late
2004 or early 2005.
Even though I am a Harry Potter fan, I hope that LEGO does not continue
the license because most of the sets have gone down in demand since
the first year.
Harry Potter is keeping us from getting new Castle sets. Though having
new castle sets does not necessarily mean great sets. LEGO is still
having its love-affair with Juniorization, at least as far as I'm concerned.
Off-topic, though, is I hope they don't cram the whole book 4 into one
movie. In my opinion, they need to make 2 movies for it, or at the very
least, offer an "extended" version on DVD that shows the bulk of the
story.
Also off-topic, I wonder why Wood was cut from P.O.A. He has a big role
at the end when Gryffindor finally wins the Quidditch House Cup.
Ben M.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Harry Potter License
|
| (...) No , Lego is NOT done with HP... (...) Intrested in HP or not the Lego series has brought a lot of great parts out that would other wise never have been made. A lot of the LOTR creations I've seen make extensive use of HP elements. Juniorized (...) (21 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
Message is in Reply To:
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
