 | | Re: A closer look at defective spiral stairs
|
|
(...) From which set? And all non-defective, I presume? For the moment I'm wondering more whether defective pieces have consistant numbers, and whether, within a single set, if any normal AND defective steps have the same numbers... DaveE (23 years ago, 20-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A closer look at defective spiral stairs
|
|
(...) That was my thought-- and even more of an easy-to-overlook mistake because the stairs slide so easily. As I said, I was completely unaware that there was a problem until I actually went and checked a 2nd time. I don't expect that this will be (...) (23 years ago, 20-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A closer look at defective spiral stairs
|
|
(...) They are random. Here's mine: 1-01 (1) 1-02 (2) 2-02 (2) 3-02 (2) 4-02 (1) 5-02 (3) 6-01 (1) 6-02 (1) 8-01 (1) 8-02 (2) Adrian -- www.brickfrenzy.com (23 years ago, 20-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A closer look at defective spiral stairs
|
|
(...) Looks like someone assembled the molds wrong IMO. That could explain why there is a 180 degree difference in the notches in the underside of the stair pieces. Simple enough of a mistake to overlook, but large enough to cause significant (...) (23 years ago, 20-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A closer look at defective spiral stairs
|
|
(...) the stair pieces in these sets are consistent or random? 1-01 (2) 1-02 (2) 2-01 2-02 3-01 3-02 (2) 4-02 5-01 6-01 (3) 7-01 8-02 -------- 16 ... and these seem to be all good. -- Pawel (23 years ago, 20-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | A closer look at defective spiral stairs
|
|
A couple days ago, Doyle Nelson alerted us all to re-examine our HP stairs: (URL) actually didn't remember a problem building either set, though upon closer inspection, I actually DID recieve "defective" stairs. It's not overly problematical or (...) (23 years ago, 20-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general, lugnet.lego) !
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone else notice the stair problem???
|
|
In lugnet.harrypotter, John Morgan writes: Oops, sreplied to the confirmation a little late (I hate that thing), oh well. (23 years ago, 20-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone else notice the stair problem???
|
|
(...) Harry Potter ... Harry Potter ... the Harry Potter with the scene with the <i>moving stairs?</i> (23 years ago, 20-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone else notice the stair problem???
|
|
(...) This issue was an easy fix, and will make the stairs not slide at all. Of course what WOULD have been nice was for Lego to have the bricks where they do not slide. Oh well. P.S. I know what you mean, Pic isn’t necessary Doyle (23 years ago, 20-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone else notice the stair problem???
|
|
(...) This all depends on your building's structure, but assuming you have the stair case leading to a second floor landing, etc., a jumper brick (or other mechanism)could a) be extended from a few bricks beneath your second floor and behind the (...) (23 years ago, 19-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
