 | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts...
|
|
(...) Or *CAN* we? Since this is a pretty silly omission for the line (and the usefulness of it as spare parts for anyones chosen theme...did the insert put the set over some piece count to price point ratio or something?), I think everyone should (...) (23 years ago, 19-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts...
|
|
(...) window (...) This is correct, the door does not have an insert in 4704. What you are seeing is apparently somehting that is actually behind the door. Doesn't look like Lego was nice enough to include a spare insert either. Oh well, can't have (...) (23 years ago, 19-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: Strange
|
|
perhaps this is a problem that is similiar to the dinosaur's line, where published pics didn't quite match the finished set. i dunno, im just hypothesizing. peace -lenny (...) catalog: (...) (23 years ago, 19-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: Harry Potter pix in S@H Catalog...
|
|
i dunno, it seems like we may be getting more pieces at the expence of complexity (and building innovation). i mean, come on, hp has three sets that utilize cardboard backrounds as key portions of the set (i mean, take the backround out of (...) (23 years ago, 19-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: it GLOWS
|
|
Because it looks cool :) Troy Keith Kirchoff <legosarefun@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:F620Ne0PaLI9mK6...ail.com... (...) anyone (...) (23 years ago, 19-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
