 | | Re: First True Harry Potter Pics!
|
|
(...) Make that LIGHT GRAY armor & sword? Now that's worth noticing! Kevin (25 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: First True Harry Potter Pics!
|
|
(...) Yeah. I don't give a hoot about Harry Potter -- haven't read the books yet, and I may never do so. But this may be an advantage as when I look at the HP sets I have no expectations that can be disappointed. The sets don't appeal very much in (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: First True Harry Potter Pics!
|
|
(...) different (...) rat (...) Thanks for the insight, my resident HP fan is at day camp all week, can't wait to show him these. Julie (25 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: First True Harry Potter Pics!
|
|
<SNIP> (...) <SNIP> These are TOADS! Neville had a TOAD, and these are TOADS! Not Froggies. I don't CARE where they came form originally, they are TOADS!!!!! (25 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: First True Harry Potter Pics!
|
|
(...) I agree for the most part (not sure about it being better than Knight's Kingdom, but it is definitely better in some ways). I think the sets are excellent for what most of us buy sets for in the first place: parts. It is superb in that (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.castle)
|
