|
|
 | | Re: Spoiler!!!
|
| (...) The Harry Potter books are easier reading than Tolkien (I'm already done with The Order of the Phoenix). I would say LOTR is the greater work while the Potter books are more accessible. -->Bruce<-- (21 years ago, 25-Jun-03, to lugnet.harrypotter, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Spoiler!!!
|
| (...) Buy or rent the books on tape, they are great. Jim Dade is the best narrator I have ever heard. I promise you if you start listening you will not be able to stop. Scott C. (21 years ago, 20-Jun-03, to lugnet.harrypotter, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Spoiler!!!
|
| (...) Couldn't say. Wouldn't either. (...) LOTR is written in a very classical manner (part of the reason why it's accepted as a great literary work instead of tossed in a pile with every other fantasy novel). Part of the big problem with reading it (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jun-03, to lugnet.harrypotter, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Spoiler!!!
|
| In lugnet.harrypotter, Richard Marchetti wrote: snip!! (...) Aw gee, Richard, it shows right up on the web interface. :-( And don't tell me you read the Daily News-- that'll ruin your reputation if nothing else will! (...) They are completely (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jun-03, to lugnet.harrypotter, FTX)
| | | | | Spoiler!!!
|
| So Dudley croaks, right? Just curious, I've never read an HP book and I doubt I ever shall since it's killing me to slog through LOTR (which I presume is better overall, but I could be wrong). -- Hop-Frog (21 years ago, 19-Jun-03, to lugnet.harrypotter, FTX)
|
|
