Subject:
|
Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 1 Dec 1998 12:56:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2733 times
|
| |
|
|
Once upon a time, lehman@javanet.com (Todd Lehman) wrote:
> blisses@worldnet.att.net (Steve Bliss) writes:
>
> > So it comes down to this: would we rather lose the ability to cross-post
> > to RTL, or allow the possibility of the unwashed 2% overflowing from RTL
> > to lugnet.*?
> >
> > I'm pretty sure what the majority of other lugnet'ers will say on this
> > one, but I'm not sure of my own position.
>
> By "unwashed" I take it you mean those who haven't completed the
> news-posting setup? Or do you mean Larry's version of "unwashed"?
I believe I mean more like Larry's unwashed. I was referring to the set
of messages which exist on RTL, and we are trying to prevent from
spilling out onto lugnet.*
> > [I wrote stuff about auto-splitting the RTL feed into multiple ngs.]
> > > You wanna take on writing that AI filter and providing tech support for it?
> > > =:*)p
> >
> > Nope. But you've already got the analysis tools to detect binaries (I'm
> > including HTML posts in this group -- make a rec.toys.lego.html if you
> > want). *.market posts could be detected by looking for keywords in the
> > subject and body. *.spam could look for subject keywords, excessively
> > long Newsgroups headers, etc.
>
> But doesn't that validate and/or encourage the practice of posting HTML,
> binaries, spam, etc.?
I meant to suggest the *.binaries, *.html and etc. groups be read-only
on lugnet. That way, no one could say lugnet was filtering/censoring,
but you wouldn't be encouraging anything. If people really wanted to
respond to posts which had been directed to these groups, the follow-up
could be set to rec.toys.lego.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
| (...) By "unwashed" I take it you mean those who haven't completed the news-posting setup? Or do you mean Larry's version of "unwashed"? (...) But doesn't that validate and/or encourage the practice of posting HTML, binaries, spam, etc.? (...) Yes, (...) (26 years ago, 30-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
|
132 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
