 | | Re: Rerelease of old Lego sets —Richard Franks
|
| | | (...) On the positive side, there are signs that TLG are beginning to re-understand their product - specifically labelling boxes 'Classic' shows that they at least have a vague concept of the retero-value of Lego. The new castle range could have (...) (25 years ago, 6-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | (canceled) —Jamie Obrien
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Rerelease of old Lego sets —Allan Bedford
|
| | | | | | Jamie Obrien <jamien@interworx.com.au> wrote in article <N+ckOPjLQK136+rRtpM...ax.com>... (...) Putting these sets back out in packing that is specifically marked as 'Reissue' should virtually eliminate any problems of value. Change the colors of (...) (25 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Rerelease of old Lego sets —Allan Bedford
|
| | | | (...) we'll see (...) (therein (...) increasingly (...) put a (...) If rereleasing better designed classic sets means that they will be considered 'no longer high-tech'... then rerelease away! Any of the LEGO space stuff, new and old alike are just (...) (25 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
