 | | Re: S@H Prices —Christopher Masi
|
| | | My impression is that the S@H prices were higher than normal retail by almost 10%. My conclusion is based on anecdotal evidence, not a thorough market study. Christopher (...) (25 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: S@H Prices —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) Yes, that's almost always true. But then, they don't charge you for shipping. So the 10% is basically a shipping & handling fee. (25 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: S@H Prices —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | Not to mention no sales tax. Not such a small amount for me in Kalifornia, I pay 8.25% locally, so S@H is almost dead even with local stores, since they rarely have sales. That, and I can't get the McD's set at Walmart ;-) I've ordered over 20 (...) (25 years ago, 23-Sep-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: S@H Prices —Christopher Masi
|
| | | | | (...) 8.75 % here (next door to Orleans Parish), 9% in Orleans Parish (New Orleans). The 4559's were actually more exspensive at the local TRU than they were through S@H. Christopher (...) (25 years ago, 23-Sep-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: S@H Prices —David Wiggins
|
| | | | (...) wow. i think this is the first time i've seen the "Kalifornia" spelling outside of a firearms/2nd ammendment newsgroup. either the VFAQman is another gun nut like me, or the state really IS that bad. the firearms newsgroup references are (...) (25 years ago, 30-Sep-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
