To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 7128
    Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer? —Steve Bliss
   (...) Only if the computer will violate patent, copyright, and other intellectual property laws. :( (...) Just wear thick shoes -- those studded decks can *hurt*! :) Steve -- More tiles! I must have more tiles! (25 years ago, 31-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer? —John Neal
    (...) I was thinking the same thing-- hopefully squishy bricks will be the rage by then;-) -John (...) (25 years ago, 31-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer? —Frank Filz
   (...) Boy, imagine the product liability lawsuits from people who tripped on the studs and did a face plant. Wonder if TLG could counter sue you for trademark infringement for displaying a permanent LEGO embossed in your face in reverse? (25 years ago, 31-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR