Subject:
|
Re: Bulk Ordering - Secrets Revealed.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 7 Aug 1999 02:49:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2301 times
|
| |
|
|
Gary Istok <gistok@umich.edu> wrote in article
<37AB385F.74533CA1@umich.edu>...
> Arjan,
Hi Todd,
> No two people have the same collection. Size may be important in other • areas,
> but not in this newsgroup. I don't want this to get into an exercise of • who
> has the biggest collection, and who doesn't.
It wasn't my intention to start such a thread in the first place. I wasn't
really serious about the "ouch" thing. Sorry if I wasn't being clear. Maybe
a :) would've been in place here...
> We already know it's Conan (2.3 million),
O.H. M.Y. G.A.W.D.!!! Now I'm definitely gonna cry! :) (Just kidding!!
Notice smiley!)
> , but he doesn't participate in the online >community. So if we do include
piece/set >counts per person, I'd rather keep it under wraps, and not
broadcast it all over the >newsgroup. Understandably some people can be
quite sensitive.
Do you think people will actually be sensitive about piece/set counts?
Personally I'd be very interested to read how many sets and bricks people
have.
Anyway, I hope I cleared things up a bit. Sorry again Todd!
--
Regards,
Arjan Brugman
abrugman@casema.net
http://www.casema.net/~abrugman/lego/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Bulk Ordering - Secrets Revealed.
|
| Arjan, No two people have the same collection. Size may be important in other areas, but not in this newsgroup. I don't want this to get into an exercise of who has the biggest collection, and who doesn't. We already know it's Conan (2.3 million), (...) (25 years ago, 6-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
155 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
