 | | Re: Mathematical proof that you can't build anything with LEGO bricks —David Eaton
| | | | (...) I think he's probably correct, from a certain perspective. Essentially, LEGO has become a more diverse toy. LEGO from the 60's and early 70's was a VERY free-form toy. There weren't many connection types, so all the pieces essentially worked (...) (13 years ago, 27-Feb-12, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Mathematical proof that you can't build anything with LEGO bricks —David Laswell
| | | | | | (...) Okay, yeah, from that specific perspective, I can see that he might have a point. A given set's part assortment has indeed become more specialized, and especially for some of the smaller ones it might be much more difficult to build a (...) (13 years ago, 28-Feb-12, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Mathematical proof that you can't build anything with LEGO bricks —Don Rogerson
| | | | | (...) Good point, but there have always been LEGO sets sold as specific models with instructions for building them. And sets were not marketed directly to children in the 60s and 70s, they were marketed to their parents, and parents (at least my (...) (13 years ago, 28-Feb-12, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | | |
