 | | Re: Lego Purity —David Eaton
| | | | (...) Alright, I sneakily changed how it calculates things behind-the-scenes, so... you're still low, but not *AS* low. Basically, I was using a weighted average and a straightforward "distance from the mean" method for calculating scoring. I now (...) (18 years ago, 25-Sep-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Lego Purity —Brian Davis
| | | | | | (...) So, then, the way you're fudging the LEGO purity scores... makes you less pure? Wow, this could get needlessly self-referential... (18 years ago, 26-Sep-07, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Lego Purity —David Eaton
| | | | | | | (...) Ow, my purity! DaveE (18 years ago, 26-Sep-07, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Lego Purity —Ross Crawford
| | | | | (...) Are you sure the Pure/Impure headings above the scores are the right way round? According to them, I score 10/10 :D ROSCO (18 years ago, 26-Sep-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | | |
