 | | Re: Trouble with IE, PNG and BS —Timothy Gould
|
| | | (...) --snip-- Hi Geoffrey, I'm afraid I have to disagree with you here. What Didier probably should have done was post the original to both .general and .off-topic.geek but it is up to the original poster to set the FUT with consideration to where (...) (18 years ago, 16-Oct-06, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Trouble with IE, PNG and BS —Geoffrey Hyde
|
| | | | "Tim Gould" <tgould.lego(AT@)gma...(DOT.)com> wrote in message news:J784tv.ECz@lugnet.com... (...) I think what Didier should have done is decide where he actually wanted to post the message in the first place. Which is why confusion with top (...) (18 years ago, 16-Oct-06, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Trouble with IE, PNG and BS —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | (...) I just realised something which is that if you are changing the followup-to you should mark it at the bottom of the message (as I have just done). That is something Didier should have done. (...) I'm not sure how he is meant to know where (...) (18 years ago, 16-Oct-06, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Trouble with IE, PNG and BS —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) That is great, except in some cases such as .announce.moc, which doesn't allow replies, so you are forced to set followups if you post there. (...) That is true, otherwise people trying to follow the thread on a newsreader will probably not (...) (18 years ago, 16-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Trouble with IE, PNG and BS —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | | --snip-- (...) --snip-- Me too. Tim (18 years ago, 16-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Trouble with IE, PNG and BS —Tim David
|
| | | | Isn't this a problem with newsreaders not having the correct functionality? Surely following a thread wherever it goes should be a basic feature of a newsreader and its a bit lacking if it doesn't? Tim (18 years ago, 16-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
