|
|
 | | Re: Nothing to say?
|
| --snip-- (...) I still don't think it should be this way. It's not so hard to focus on what is good in an otherwise mediocre model. I've also noticed that MOCs have to also be photographed well these days to get much response... that makes it even (...) (18 years ago, 12-Oct-06, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Nothing to say?
|
| Hello! (...) You are probably referring to Mocpages. And what happens there is, I guess, this: People come along a MOC, see it's (for example) Castle stuff, are Mecha kids themselves, think "blah, Castle, boring" and rate it 1/6. On Lugnet there (...) (18 years ago, 12-Oct-06, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Nothing to say?
|
| (...) I think you hit it- our standards are so high that a MOC has to REALLY have some element(s) about it to get a response. I don't post much in terms of written feedback but I do use the highlight/spotlight function often. I figure it's giving (...) (18 years ago, 12-Oct-06, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Nothing to say?
|
| (...) No need for Atticus .........yet. Though we seem to have enough Boo Radleys about :^) -pete.w (18 years ago, 12-Oct-06, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Nothing to say?
|
| (...) Then there should be a feature for an uploaded MOC to be rated 1 - 10 or something in a poll. Something really quick and easy-- look at the ESPN poll on the front page. It should work that simple and fast. If I have to log in and go through (...) (18 years ago, 12-Oct-06, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
|
