Subject:
|
Re: Bad examples are getting worse :-(
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 8 Sep 2006 11:59:12 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
3688 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Frank Filz wrote:
> This would be a horrible idea. It would be so abuseable to delete pictures
> from people that for some reason are disliked, or content that someone
> objects to. Can you imagine how quickly Brendan Powell Smith's Bible
> pictures would be voted off...
I agree. But there could be a voting without consequences, like at mocpages. One
category could be "artwork and presentation". So blurry pics could cause a
"negative" vote.
> On the subject of overly large pictures - I would love to see pictures over
> some size re-sampled to say 800x600, though the original should also be
> available (sometimes it's nice to be able to zoom in). But if the default
> was to display maximum 1024x768 or some such, with larger pictures
> re-sampled down, that would be way cool...
If the photographer takes both overview and detailed pics there is no need to
zoom in. A automatic resize functionality down to 800x600 would be perfect.
> ... These days, I just don't
> have the time, so they get uploaded as is ...
I do not understand this way of thinking. If you do not have the time to sort
out your pics or run them through a resize-batch process before uploading, I
will not have time to surf and enjoy such a gallery. If the creator spends so
little interest in presenting his/her stuff, why should the spectator spend even
more time looking at the pics?
Holger
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Bad examples are getting worse :-(
|
| (...) [...] (...) Hi Holger, Don't forget that some users use BS as a storing facility for their own needs or just to exchange stuffs with friends...and not for the pleasure of the "spectator" you are. But this thread is a great one and I agree most (...) (18 years ago, 8-Sep-06, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Bad examples are getting worse :-(
|
| (...) This would be a horrible idea. It would be so abuseable to delete pictures from people that for some reason are disliked, or content that someone objects to. Can you imagine how quickly Brendan Powell Smith's Bible pictures would be voted (...) (18 years ago, 7-Sep-06, to lugnet.general)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
