Subject:
|
Re: Questions about fan involvement with TLC
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 16 Apr 2006 00:56:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2296 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, C. L. GunningCook wrote:
| |
In particular, to Calum, no, I don’t think that any of my
questions/answers/resulting conclusions are remotely world changing nor would
it be “preventing the next Nobel prize winning thesis” but... I also don’t
recall LUGNET changing to a “World Event Symposium”. Therefore ~ In my
opinion, company and fan relations are a valid part of discussion here.
|
I never criticized your post--I think your question is a good one to be asked.
That said, what I did question was:
| |
b) If so (based on Q3a), is this a reasonable price to pay to have so
many of our high profile members unable to discuss things openly?
|
As for b) I don’t think anything’s really lost. It’s not like we’re preventing
the next Nobel prize winning thesis on relativity or cold fusion from being
published.
I’m answering the question “are the NDA’s preventing positive contributions?”
I’m not asking “are Janey’s questions/answers preventing positive
contributions?”
Your questions are important ones, and it’s good to discuss them. This is
certainly the right place for them. That said, my personal opinion, as
originally posted (and incorrectly understood, I guess) is that no, I don’t
think the NDA’s are really causing that much trouble for the community.
Calum
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Questions about fan involvement with TLC
|
| In lugnet.general, C. L. GunningCook wrote: As a follow up... First of all I would like to thank everyone that took time to respond to my questions, it helped bring a new understanding and brought up some points I hadn't considered. I do want to (...) (19 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
63 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
