Subject:
|
Re: MDP (was: Questions about fan involvement with TLC)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 11 Apr 2006 23:31:04 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
2368 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.general, Ross Crawford wrote:
> > In lugnet.general, Calum Tsang wrote:
> > >
> > > Let me start with the disclaimer that I am on the NXT MDP, though I'm probably
> > > the least active member due to personal commitments right now.
> >
> > Well, I'm sorry, but I have to ask - if you have so many other commitments, why
> > did you apply? I'm sure there's many others who would have loved to participate,
> > and have more time to contribute.
>
> I do think in this case it's an interesting point, though. To widen it out a
> bit, it certainly does show that LEGO do not always evaluate candidates for
> things quite the way we expect they would.
Well unfortunately there was no "What are your current personal commitments"
question on the application, so LEGO had no way to evaluate that information.
Surely it makes more sense, and is much easier for the applicant to evaluate it,
and make the decision to apply (or not) accordingly?
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: MDP (was: Questions about fan involvement with TLC)
|
| (...) Berate you? Not me, at any rate, although I can't speak for anyone else. But I DO find it interesting how you hone in on just one point so often. I do think in this case it's an interesting point, though. To widen it out a bit, it certainly (...) (19 years ago, 11-Apr-06, to lugnet.general)
|
63 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
