Subject:
|
Re: Questions about fan involvement with TLC
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:52:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2177 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, C. L. GunningCook wrote:
> Q1. Are the NDA keeping our most prolific quiet? (Aside from the obvious, I
> understand they can't discuss certain things, but are there people that would
> have been posting otherwise that are now remaining silent, in fear that even
> guessing or hypothesising might end up being factual, and then be some violation
> of their agreement?)
That's a good question. It's been a long time since I was 'prolific', but I am
in the MDP. In general, NDA's cover confidential information actually disclosed
(on purpose or accidently), not other informaiton. The problem comes in keeping
straight which information is general knowledge vs. privileged vs. guessed-at.
> Q2. Is this hindering or benefiting our communication as a community?
I'm guessing it's helping, in general. But it's an important thing for group
leaders to think about before jumping onto the NDA bandwagon -- if all the
leaders are under NDA, who's going to be out herding the rabble-rousers?
> Q4. Are members spending many of their community hours behind the scenes that
> they don't have time as much free time to dedicate to the public forums that
> they once had?
This is the killer for me. I don't have tons of 'lego time' right now, and what
I do have is taken up with the MDP stuff (in a good way :).
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Questions about fan involvement with TLC
|
| After an interesting chat about "Fan involvement with TLC" the other night, a few concerns/questions came up, and I can't seem to shake them. Historically a large portion of AfoL/ALE's have wanted a closer relationship with TLC and over the last few (...) (19 years ago, 10-Apr-06, to lugnet.general) !!
|
63 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
