 | | Re: The LEGO Revival Survey
|
|
(...) They are toys that stimulate creativity and they helped me develop mathematical and spatial skills as a child. The toys are a connection to my past (I am still playing with the bricks I got 28 years ago), yet they still allow me to look (...) (19 years ago, 30-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The LEGO Revival Survey
|
|
Here are my thoughts. Mark (...) It's a toy that allows you to be creative and the bricks last forever. It's also a toy for all ages. (...) Play value, durability. (...) Recently, too much juniorization, even my kids are complaining about this. In (...) (19 years ago, 30-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | BrickJournal's Plans...
|
|
Hi all, it's been a bit of time since I last posted, and some things have been happening with BrickJournal. Staff The BrickJournal staff has been expanded and is as follows: Joe Meno, Editor/Publisher Jim Foulds, Assistant Editor Geoff Gray, Photo (...) (19 years ago, 30-Jul-05, to lugnet.publish.brickjournal, lugnet.general, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Pick a Brick
|
|
(...) Yeah but have you been to all three yet? (: The next closest is in St. Paul. I drop by the Michigan Av store in Chicago about once a month because I go to U. of Chicago there. From the times I've been to the Woodfield store I like Woodfield's (...) (19 years ago, 30-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Hobby Show November (Toronto)
|
|
(...) This thread has been too quiet, so I thought I'd try to see if we could get some discussion started about this. Please see Dave's notes above (or reread his entire original post). This is really good news, if you as me! There must be some (...) (19 years ago, 29-Jul-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.loc.ca.on, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The LEGO Revival Survey
|
|
(...) Because they are still the best construction toy on the market. (...) The quality is better than the clones. (...) Original space themes have largely been replaced with Star Wars. (...) I like the newer "generic" building sets as well as the (...) (19 years ago, 29-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Errors
|
|
(...) Wow Phil, that one is hard to top! (Phil and I talk frequently over Lego "anomalies", things that are not quite as one would expect them.) My favorite British error (I got this one from Phil several years ago), which is not really an error... (...) (19 years ago, 29-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The LEGO Revival Survey
|
|
1) I like the colors and versitility. 2) Endless hours of creativity and possabilities. 3) FAR Too many single or limited-use elements. Bionicle if full of them. 4) Nice new colors. 5) Brick packs (bulk) in the cool new colors - dk red, dk green, (...) (19 years ago, 29-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Errors
|
|
(...) The most obvious one I can remember was the 1977 UK Catalogue said 67 on the front instead! Phil (19 years ago, 29-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The LEGO Revival Survey
|
|
Woops, substitute "designer" in my post for "creator" Not enough coffee this morning... (19 years ago, 29-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
|
