 | | Re: memberships
|
| (...) That works too. :) (...) It's fairly high, but getting the basic memberships ready is now at the very top (and that's got two or three sub-parts to go in simultaneously) now that the new layout is in place. (...) There have been ideas kicking (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jun-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: memberships
|
| (...) Transfer 100 USD from my AucZILA account to prepay my lifetime membership, please. I know it's going to be worth at LEAST that much to me, maybe much more. How much more depends on where my house ends up... :-) (25 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: memberships
|
| Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) Oh no, no more Auczilla? I hope when you reach this point the Auczilla interface will soon be made available to members. Now that would be neat, Auczilla just presents the buying public one huge continuous (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: memberships
|
| (...) If the AucZILLA interface were available to me right now, and if it also supported web bidding in addition to e-mail, and if it did what I've always envisioned (I tell it I have 10 copies of set XXXX and it spits out lots for me to approve, (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: memberships
|
| (...) Oh it's not going away; there will always be parts auctions of that type. They just won't typically be under that name. The long-term plan for auczilla.com doesn't have much (if anything) to do with LEGO; all of its LEGO-related assets will (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: memberships
|
| (...) Or even if I had to upload the inventory of the set, and then tell it how many copies, etc. Steve (25 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: memberships
|
| (...) Given a little warning, I'll have something set up and ready to go as soon as you do. Would you be doing controlled tests with particular people, or just opening it for testing and use? (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: memberships
|
| (...) This would arguably be more valuable, since it means you could easily save out the parts you buy the set(s) for. Heck, I'd be happy if it were just a brick auction place that I could run an auction at. But then again, I think anything I ran (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: memberships
|
| (...) Ditto, I'd be able to do something almost instantly. Big surprise. (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: memberships
|
| (...) It would also be arguably less valuable, becuase you'd have to go through all the work of establishing the inventory, and keying it in. But requiring the auctioneer to supply the inventory also makes the whole idea more practical, because the (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: memberships
|
| (...) Hrmmm... maybe I dreamed this, but at one time I thought it would work like this: You tell it you have 8 copies of 6097. It spits out an inventory of those sets. You mark the parts you _don't_ want (say the cauldrons and horse barding). The (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: memberships
|
| (...) multiple (...) As long as I can set the lot sizes myself if I don't like what it comes up with, I'll be happy, too. Also, I hope there is a database of LDraw part images we can access and add to, if need be. Jeff P.S. I'd try it out too, if it (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
