Subject:
|
Re: No Lego Window System
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 14 Mar 2005 23:20:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
886 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Frank Filz wrote:
> David Eaton wrote:
> > In lugnet.general, Frank Filz wrote:
> > > http://www.maj.com/gallery/ffilz/NewHome/4061222-1.jpg
> Yea, that would get the arch, the trouble is how tight into the peak the
> arch fits. For a larger scale, the 1x5x4 half arches might work to get
> something close. At a larger scale, one could do the arch using inverse
> slopes or even just staggered bricks, or possibly some kind of SNOT
> construction.
Oh sure, use logic against me. My one weakness! It's a pretty tight squeeze--
the corners might indeed stick out of the roof if left as a normal 1x6x2 arch...
I guess I'd probably just fudge a little and bring the window down a bit or the
roof up. I guess if you're going with the 45 degree angle roof, you might even
get a bit of extra room from the increased slope (Or less if you worked from the
top down instead of the bottom up).
But my guess is you might need a bigger arch anyway. Looks like that window is
maybe... 5 feet wide? Hm. I guess 4 studs wouldn't be a bad match. And the odds
of Lego coming out with a 1x7x2.3 arch with missing corners is about zilch. A
1x8x3 arch maybe. Which might be TOO big. Dang. I dunno.
DaveE
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: No Lego Window System
|
| (...) Yea, that would get the arch, the trouble is how tight into the peak the arch fits. For a larger scale, the 1x5x4 half arches might work to get something close. At a larger scale, one could do the arch using inverse slopes or even just (...) (20 years ago, 14-Mar-05, to lugnet.general)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
