| |
In lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, Richard Parsons wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, Sonnich Jensen wrote:
| |
Now I read this:
http://www.lego.com/eng/info/default.asp?page=pressdetail&contentid=13026&countrycode=2057&yearcode=&archive=false
|
I see that Lego paid for the destruction rather than have them given to a
charity, presumeably for distribution to the poor.
I read between the lines that this is Finnish law, that siezed illegal goods
can be destroyed or given to charity.
The article claimed that the clones were dangerous and could break in normal
play and cut children. This has not been my experience of any clones, not
even the shifty Shifty.
|
Indeed.
Although a headline like “Rich Multinational Toy Company Gives Poor Finnish
Children Second Rate Building Bricks for Christmas” could hardly appeal to
Lego...
Cheers
Richie Dulin
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
