 | | Acronym acrimony —Thomas Main
|
| | | I have always disliked the acronym "TLG" for the Lego Group. I realize that this is a term which rtl'ers adopted long ago - but it doesn't make sense to me. I am not sure exactly how the Lego Group is structured and how decisions are made within and (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Acronym acrimony —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | (...) I would prefer "LG" as the "L" is intuitive. I think the "T" is in there just so folks don't have to type "the", as it's designation in the acronym is so that people reading know that the subject in question is the corporation or group of (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Acronym acrimony —Eric Brok
|
| | | | (...) just (...) I agree TLG or LG are useful to distinguish between company and product line (or brand). But what's so wrong about calling the product line/ brand name "LEGO" ?! It's not just bricks. In the Netherlands we say 'Do you have any LEGO (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
