To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 48675
48674  |  48676
Subject: 
Re: Trademark defense doesn't work vs Mega Bloks
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general
Date: 
Fri, 6 Aug 2004 15:41:46 GMT
Viewed: 
171 times
  

Since TLC only owned the patent on the fully tubed variety, and none of those
clones seems to use a perfectly identical interior design, I'm betting they were
all trying to skirt around the patent by using slightly different designs.


Actually, the original 'tubes patent' explicitly included substituted shapes for
the tubes, such as crosses.
TLG patents even what they will *not* produce, and in this case quite
understandably.

Eric Brok



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Trademark defense doesn't work vs Mega Bloks
 
(...) That's only because Mickey Mouse can't be patented. If he could, you'd be able to renew patents by now. Disney would have seen to it. (...) Since TLC only owned the patent on the fully tubed variety, and none of those clones seems to use a (...) (20 years ago, 4-Aug-04, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)

18 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR